Homestead mailing list

[<shepperd AT austincc.edu>]

Just for curiosity, I did a Google search and it turned up gobs of sites. 
Here's one I thought interesting:
http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/rules.html

There appears to be a fairly large amount of information at this URL.

Jerry S.



Paul Hillman <chris_hillman AT msn.com> said:

> I have heard through hear-say, that some of the Rules of the Common Law 
> include:
> 
> 1-There is NO "crime" without a "victim".
> 2-The "victim" files the "complaint", not the "state".
> 3-The "state" cannot be the "victim". (The "state" being a non-entity.)
> 4-No "law" can be passed to compell the specific performance of a person.
> 
> But, I can't find this in writing anywhere, or any good explanation.
Apparently the writers of the Constitution understood them however. Whatever
happened to this knowledge?
> 
> Paul Hillman
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Paul Hillman<mailto:chris_hillman AT msn.com> 
>   To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org> 
>   Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 7:12 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Homestead] Daniel and taxes again
> 
> 
>   Jerry,
> 
>   The 7th Amendment states that the "rules of the Common Law" shall apply as
per the wording therein. The Common Law dates back to the Magna Carta from 
1150?
> 
>   Thus, what are the rules of the common law?
> 
>   Paul Hillman
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: Jerry W.
Shepperd<mailto:shepperd AT austincc.edu<mailto:shepperd AT austincc.edu>> 
>     To:
homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>>

>     Cc:
homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>>

>     Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 5:29 PM
>     Subject: Re: [Homestead] Daniel and taxes again
> 
> 
>     Paul,
> 
>     I know you asked Daniel the question.  However, common law is simply 
> the 
>     decisions of judges (judges making laws) who attempt to fill in the 
> details 
>     of constitutions where written laws are absent or unclear.  It is not 
> part 
>     of the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights.
> 
>     Jerry S.
>   _______________________________________________
>   Homestead list and subscription:
>  
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead<http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>
>   Change your homestead list member options:
>  
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/chris_hillman%40msn.com<http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/chris_hillman AT msn.com>
>   View the archives at:
>  
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead<https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/shepperd%40austincc.edu
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
> 
> 
> 



--