gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Kata Markon
List archive
- From: JFAlward AT aol.com
- To: gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 03:28:44 EDT
In a message dated 10/21/02 10:52:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
JOE ALWARD
In Mark 13:32-37, Jesus tells the story of the type of failure servants must
not be guilty of: closing their eyes while the master is away. There is not
the slightest hint in this parable that Mark wanted the readers to think of
the servants' failure in terms of their testing God.
LARRY SWAIN
No one has claimed so, so the value of this is nil.
JOE ALWARD
Nil?
Unless one denies that Mark's story of Jesus and the sleeping disciples is
NOT based on the parallel antecedent parable of the sleeping servants, one
cannot escape the implications of the absence of the testing of God theme in
the antecedent story. The fact that "no one has claimed so," except me, is
exactly the point. Gibson and others will deny that the one story is the
antecedent of the other at their peril, and the absence of the testing of God
theme in the antecedent is damning evidence against Gibson's claim.
Thanks for you comments, Larry, but I don't think I have the time address
possibly two different defenses simultaneously, so I will leave your other
thoughtful comments unanswered. Unless Jeffrey agrees to stand by all of
your arguments, and adopt them as his own, I would prefer to wait to see how
HE defends his thesis. It is no more appropriate for you to be arguing on
Jeff's behalf, while he remains silent, then it would be for a doctoral
candidate to stand silent while his thesis advisor answered the
interrogators' questions on his behalf at his PhD oral exam. Jeff can speak
for himself, I am certain, and probably will defend his thesis himself when
and if he thinks he needs to do so.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Joseph F. Alward, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
University of the Pacific
Stockton CA 95201
email: JFAlward AT aol.com
Web Page: "A Skeptical View of Christianity and the Bible"
http://members.aol.com/jalw/joseph_alward.html
-
Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper
, (continued)
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/20/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, Emmanuel Fritsch, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, jgibson000, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/21/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, L. J. Swain, 10/22/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/22/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, L. J. Swain, 10/22/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/22/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 10/22/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, L. J. Swain, 10/23/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/25/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, Eric Eve, 10/25/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/25/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/25/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, Ralph Cox, 10/25/2002
- Re: Critique of Gibson's Conference Paper, JFAlward, 10/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.