Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: [freetds] 0.65 (or whatever) TODO

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.65 (or whatever) TODO
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:57:17 +0200

>
> ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> >
> > > so SQLError return errors in the wrong order :(. I'll
> look at unixODBC
> > > source.
> >
> > ???? I can't believe it... unixODBC sort errors alphabetically !!!
> >
> > so "goodbye" < "hello"..
> >
> > See check_error_order in DriverManager/__info.c (called by
> > insert_into_error_list).
> > This in both 2.2.11 and 2.2.12!
>
> ROFL! I can't believe it. Not only that, but the
> specification says it's
> OK!
>
> "If there are two or more records with the highest
> rank, it is undefined
> which record is the first record."
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> us/odbc/htm/odbcsequence_of_status_records.asp
>
> That is, if two PRINT messages arrive from the server -- both
> being "class
> 0" -- there's no "correct" order in which to print them. I would have
> thought "in the order they were received/generated" would make more
> sense....
>
> Are you thinking of sending them a patch, or should I put
> that on my TODO?
>

Yes, it would be good.

>
> +++
>
> I especially want DBD::ODBC to work well with errors and
> such. I'm much
> more optimistic now than I was; so far, you ve found bugs in my
> application and the DM, but not in the driver itself. Thanks
> for working
> on it.
>

Don't forget that every nigth DBD::ODBC get tested again current CVS and
mssql2k, see http://freetds.sourceforge.net/out/test/test.1.html.

freddy77





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page