FreeTDS Development Group

["Gad Hayisraeli" <gadh AT vmanage.com>]

yes you're right. currently the sources i used of freetds were 0.60 stable 
version , but in another project i'm trying
to compile it in win32 too, and therefore i use for this the 0.61-rc version.

are there any performance improvements in the current 0.61 snapshot compared 
to 0.60 ?

Gad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: freetds-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:freetds-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of James K. Lowden
> Sent: ?a 06 oaoaao 2003 20:02?
> To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [freetds] slow freetds-sybase perfromance - thorough test
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:00:40 +0200, "Gad Hayisraeli" <gadh AT vmanage.com>
> wrote:
> > > Just to double check: Are you using FreeTDS 0.60?  If so, you really
> > > should get last night's snapshot (don't use rc1).  We discovered a bug
> > > some time ago that caused FreeTDS to write to the log file even when
> > > it should not. That would definitely affect performance, and is
> > > consistent with the "wide tables are slower" observation.  Also,
> >
> > i tried with debug log and without it and it did not show any difference
> > .
>
> That sounds like 0.60.
>
> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
>