corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Mark D. Nanos" <nanos AT gvi.net>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Galatian situation
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:29:33 -0500
Certain individuals (the
influencers in Galatia, some Christian Pharisees in
Judea if we can believe Acts 15:1-5 -- but not any of
the apostles to be sure, on this I agree with you and
Mark) were evidently of the mind that Gentiles should
submit to being circumcised, and if the decision of
Acts 15:19-20 had been reached, why on earth would
Paul not have cited it?
Loren Rosson III,
Loren,
I think this is a good question. What do others think?
Regards,
Mark Nanos
-
RE: Galatian situation
, (continued)
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/19/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Elli Elliott, 09/19/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Loren Rosson, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Loren Rosson, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Kathryn J. S. Smith, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, JERRY SUMNEY, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Loren Rosson, 09/21/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/22/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/22/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/22/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.