corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "John Dickson" <jdickson AT bigpond.com>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 08:30:28 +1000
Another thing to keep in mind: a 13 letter corpus is probably a little too
small a sample from which to acheive 'certainty' regarding an author's
style, theology, etc., especially if the 13 were written over a ten year
period to socially/religiously diverse congregations/individuals.
The differences between some letters are real and invite explanation but, in
my opinion, too much is made of too little. In the face of so small a
collection of data with which to 'play', more epistemic humility is required
on the part of those of us who play with it all day long.
Just a thought.
John Dickson
Department of Ancient History
Macquarie University
Sydney, Australia
jdickson AT bigpond.com
-
Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus,
Jimi Fosdick, 10/07/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Jim West, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Zeba Crook, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Perry L. Stepp, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, John Dickson, 10/07/1999
- Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Graham Hamer, 10/08/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Yuri Kuchinsky, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Yuri Kuchinsky, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Perry L. Stepp, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, David C. Hindley, 01/30/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.