corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Jimi Fosdick <JFosdick AT callisto.com>
- To: 'C-P' <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 13:35:49 -0500
> Greetings,
>
> I am not a regular poster here, but spend most of my time on XTalk however
> recent discussions there have raised questions in my mind which are more
> the focus of this list.
>
> I have for some time been aware of the general scholarly concensus that
> the so-called "pastoral" epistles (I&II Tim, Titus) are not authentically
> Pauline, which is to say not written by HP. I am wondering what the degree
> of certainty is regarding the other letters of the Pauline corpus. Also
> which letters are considered to originate with HP but in their current
> form represent heavily redacted or interpolated versions of the original.
>
> I apologize if these questions are tiresomely naive.
>
> Jimi Fosdick
> Wheaton, IL
>
> "Philosophy is a field of study designed to keep dangerously incompetant
> people in the University, and away from sharp objects and moving
> machinery."
>
-
Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus,
Jimi Fosdick, 10/07/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Jim West, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Zeba Crook, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Perry L. Stepp, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 10/07/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, John Dickson, 10/07/1999
- Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Graham Hamer, 10/08/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Yuri Kuchinsky, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Yuri Kuchinsky, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, Perry L. Stepp, 10/11/1999
- Re: Authenticity in the Pauline Corpus, David C. Hindley, 01/30/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.