Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: II Corinthians

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Frank W. Hughes" <fwhughes AT sunbeach.net>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: II Corinthians
  • Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 18:45:54 -0300

. . . the undeniable practice of pseudonymity at that time,
just that I want to be just as critical toward any theory put forward as I
am with the view that it replaces). I'm puzzled how people can be so
confident, when at least some arguments that used to be offered against the
Pauline authorship of the disputed letters have gradually been eroded.
What I'm puzzled about is the fact that we seem not to be bothered in the least by referring to the pseudonymous letters of Plato or the pseudo-Ciceronian Rhetorica ad Herennium or the pseudo-Aristotelian Rhetorica ad Alexandrum, et cetera, not to mention pseudonymity in Jewish apocalyptic literature, but we get very bothered by pseudonymity in Paul and other NT writers.  This is similar to my puzzlement that nobody has any problem identifying rhetorical elements in letters by Cicero or especially Demosthenes; yet when we identify some of the same rhetorical features in Paul's letters, all hell breaks loose!

Frank W. Hughes
Codrington College
St. John, Barbados



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page