Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - II Corinthians

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Garland <David_Garland AT baylor.edu>
  • To: Paulinum Corpus <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: II Corinthians
  • Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:35:09 -0500


That 2 Corinthians is a compilation of letters has almost become orthodoxy,
though I think it wrong. Nevertheless, Occam's razor should lead us to
choose the simplest solution. John Hurd's explanation fits that criterion.
The letters to the Corinthians were arranged in order of descending length: 1
Cor; 2 Cor 1-9; 2 Cor 10-13.
(Did a compiler of the Pauline corpus who arranged the letters according to
length want Romans and Corinthians to be first and second and then feel the
need to combine 2 Cor 10-13 with 1-9 so that 10-13 would not discombobulate
the ordering pattern by coming before Galatians?)

But the letters were not simply attached to one another. The missing
conclusion to chapters 1-9, and the missing salutation and thanksgiving
section of chapters 10-13 requires a deliberate editing by someone who
cropped off the original opening formulas and closing benedictions. The
greetings and thanksgiving section in Paul's letters, however, were never
perfunctory but an essential lead-in to the themes discussed in the body of
the letter, and a redactor must have ignored that function to make a
composite letter. The questions who did this and why are frequently ignored
or given only perfunctory explanations that, in my opinion, strain credulity
more than trying to makes sense of the twists and turns in Paul's thought.

David.E. Garland
George W. Truett Theological Seminary
Baylor University




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page