Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ch-scene - Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking

ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: RTP-area local music and culture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: grady <grady AT ibiblio.org>
  • To: RTP-area local music and culture <ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking
  • Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:44:26 -0400

In the past month, I have attended [multiple] shows at the Cat's Cradle, Bull City Headquarters, and the Cave. I haven't been to any shows at Local 506. Saturday night I walked up to 506 from the Cave and sat around outside talking to some friends in the between-bands downtime, but then once Filthybird went on, I had to decide between seeing a band I really liked in nasty smoky Local 506, or walking back to the Cave to see Twilighter (a band I like, but not as much as Filthybird) in smoke-free comfort, and I chose the Cave.

So I think anything you were to do to mitigate the smoke would be a very good thing, although I'm not sure about this half-measure you're proposing, which would necessitate running a smoke-gauntlet to enter/leave the club, to use the bathroom, or to buy drinks. It's possible to do all 3 of those at the Cave, plus watch the band, without ever going into the smoking back room.

But I'd at least be willing to give it a try. Be aware, though, that in the past your perception of the smokiness of the club has differed sharply from mine, a fact that I've chalked up to your senses having been dulled from all the secondhand smoke ;-)

What direction does the ventilation move in Local 506? I should know this already, but I don't. If the outside-air fans at either end aren't set up to pull air from the back alley and push it out onto Franklin, you'll need to change that . . .

If you're going to do anything that involves changing the smoking situation at 506, you'll have to do a couple of things if you intend for the experiment to be semi-valid:

1) publicize the change thoroughly to the large community of folks who might be attending shows were it not for the smoke (and keep in mind that they may not even be aware that's why they aren't attending shows . . . it may be more like "I'm too tired to go to a show on a weeknight because I feel like crap all the next day," not realizing that it was the smoke that was primarily responsible for that feeling of assy-ness)

2) wait long enough for the word to trickle out, and for the smokers to adjust, before declaring the experiment a success/failure

Keep us posted!

Ross

local506 AT gmail.com wrote:
Although this discussion died down on here, it's still something I've
been battling on a regular basis at the club. Recently, by request of
the artist, we tried restricting smoking to the bar-area only, while
no smoking was allowed in the room where the artist performed. And it
worked really well - I got several comments about how (somehow!) the
smoke itself didn't infiltrate the smoke-less room (or likely, it did
so at ceiling-level, not head-level!) And this show was well-
attended, over 100 people.

Anyway, I'm seriously considering this as a permanent policy, but
looking for feedback before making this decision.

glenn / local 506

ps: Of course, all Summer I've been seriously considering adding wine,
updating our Reverbnation page, taking a vaction, among other things,
and they haven't happened yet (but Summer's not over!)

-- ch-scene: the list that mirrors alt.music.chapel-hill --
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page