Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ch-scene - Re: Off topic talk of..How'd my man do?

ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: RTP-area local music and culture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: philipayers AT yahoo.com (My friend Phil said,)
  • To: ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: Off topic talk of..How'd my man do?
  • Date: 6 Oct 2004 05:38:52 -0700

Why would anyone? I agree. Of course you and I have made our minds up
long ago, but its' these very strange people who haven't that I'm
concerned about and these people can and do get their opinions
adjusted by the media, I think?? If a media company, pundit, whoever
on tv, wanted to push one candidate over another they can and do, with
results. I thought Edwards demolished Chaney. My point was, there is a
bias in favor of Chaney for some reason. I guess you already knew
that? I know, you're cool, you've made that clear.

tmorman AT nc.rr.com (Todd Morman) wrote in message
news:<EHEGJCIMGBFEJBKNECJDMEEHEIAA.tmorman AT nc.rr.com>...
> > I'd have to say contrary to Chris Mathews and all
> > those totally blind pundit, Edwards kicked the fat guy
> > around!!
>
> Why anyone would watch *any* of the pundits' post-debate spin is beyond me.
> Think for yourselves, dammit.
>
> But then, why anyone would watch the debate on any channel other than C-SPAN
> (which uses a boring ol' split-screen to show both candidates throughout the
> entire debate) is also beyond me. I'd rather watch the channel that uses the
> most obviously fair journalism in covering the event instead of watching a
> channel that allows financial considerations to affect the number of
> jump-cuts inserted into the coverage.
>
> Why on earth would anyone prefer letting someone else decide when they see
> candidates' reaction shots? Jesus. Come on, people.
>
> todd like this is rocket science morman
>
> -- ch-scene: the list that mirrors alt.music.chapel-hill --
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page