cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn AT gmail.com>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:55 +0100
On 13 January 2012 18:41, Greg London <email AT greglondon.com> wrote:
> Creative Commons, despite having "commons" in its name, is not entirely
> devoted to licensing what would be called "Free" phenomenom.
I personally endorse the position of CC to not only support fully
open, but also to seek models in-between. However, I think it would be
timely if CC were to strengthen the differentiation between open and
non-open licenses, by applying different branding, either separate, or
under a common umbrella to these groups. Given the present
incompatibility between various licenses, many (especially individual)
users are being mislead.
Gregor
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Kerrick Long, 01/21/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Ben Finney, 01/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Kerrick Long, 01/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Diane Cabell, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial - CC+, Heather Morrison, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial - CC+, Diane Peters, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Chris Sakkas, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Diane Cabell, 01/26/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Jane Park, 01/26/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, drew Roberts, 01/25/2012
- [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial-EDU, Heather Morrison, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Rob Myers, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg Grossmeier, 01/23/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Rob Myers, 01/24/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg Grossmeier, 01/23/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.