cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:03:23 +0000
On 13/01/12 17:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> That's the route I think CC should do. NC and ND should allow people
> to open up their heads to the concept, find alternate ways to get
> money from their works (or acknowledge their works aren't made just to
> get money), and end up picking up a real free license, contributing to
> the commons.
Is there any evidence that this happens? I've asked in the past,
probably not for a year or two now, but last time there was no evidence
that people were choosing free licenses after initially going NC or ND.
If there is evidence that people are relicensing, I'd be less
implaccably opposed to NC/ND. :-)
- Rob.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial - CC+
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial - CC+, Diane Peters, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Chris Sakkas, 01/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Diane Cabell, 01/26/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Jane Park, 01/26/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, drew Roberts, 01/25/2012
- [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial-EDU, Heather Morrison, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Rob Myers, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg Grossmeier, 01/23/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Rob Myers, 01/24/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg Grossmeier, 01/23/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.