Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn AT gmail.com>]

> Yes, the title of this thread is confusing.  These shouldn't be

> referred to as time-limited licenses.

Agreed, my initial error!

Agreed. I also question the need for new licenses.
I can publish my work with a note that says: "if you receive this work
before date X, it's cc-by-nc, and if it's after date X, it's
cc-by-sa". We don't need new licenses. At most, we need new deeds, if
at all.

I agree in sofar as I think we need less licenses: less attraction to the NC-license. Removing the NC license altogether is not a fair idea, but limiting it to time-limited-NC-condition only seemed a good compromise to me.

Also, many platforms support multiple CC license, none that I now supports what you describe. If you are an expert, or owner of your own platform, yes you can do it of course.

Gregor