cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
- From: Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:11:19 -0800
um, a collective work is the same as a collection under CC licenses. a collective work is the US description for what is described as a Collection in the Unported licenses (which are based on international treaties).
On Mar 2, 2007, at 2:15 AM, Antoine wrote:
So, the BY-SA decided not to apply to collective works but the GPL decided
to
apply to collective works. ??? Is that right?
No.
"Collective works" and "collections" are not the same thing.
A collective work is a single cohesive work that has been worked on by
several people. A collection of works is, well... a collection.
As Rob I think the GPL's "mere aggregation" is equivalent to the
CC-by-sa's "collections".
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Rob Myers, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Antoine, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, rob, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Antoine, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Mia Garlick, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Rob Myers, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Antoine, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Peter Brink, 03/03/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, James Grimmelmann, 03/03/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Dana Powers, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Rob Myers, 03/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.