Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
  • To: peter.brink AT brinkdata.se, Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:03:07 -0500

On Friday 02 March 2007 06:10 am, Peter Brink wrote:
> Rob Myers skrev:
> > One thing I'm curious about is whether including (e.g.) a short poem
> > makes an essay a derivative of it, or whether that kind of quotation has
> > the same aggregate/collective status as a photographic "quotation".
>
> As far as civil law jurisdictions goes I would assume that the answer is
> no.
>
> drew Roberts skrev:
> > Does fixing spelling, punctuation, and other minor things make
> > derivative or a cleaned up copy.
>
> AFAIK in civil law jurisdictions the answer is no. In the U.K. probably
> yes. In the U.S.? I'm not sure, it would depend I guess on the level of
> creativity involved and on the amount of editing done.
>
> > Would a collage make a derivative work or a collection of cropped
> > works?
>
> If you use parts of other pictures to create a new picture, then in
> civil law jurisdictions the answer is yes.

Thanks for the answers, can you define what a new picture is in this context?
What if there is just parts of other pictures jumbled together?
>
>
> /Peter Brink

all the best,

drew
--
(da idea man)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page