cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
- From: "Dana Powers" <dana.powers AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:13:20 -0800
On 3/2/07, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
Otherwise, where in law is the difference between a collection and
non-collection spelled out. After all, a book is generally a collection of
chapters. A chapter a collection of paragraphs. A paragraph a collection of
words. A word a collection of letters. Are we gonna display a page and then
have a copyright table saying letters 1,5,11 are BY-SA, letters 21,56,75 are
BY, words 6, 25-60 are BY-SA, words 70-95 are BY, everything else on the page
is ARR?
I know that is stupid, but can someone who knows tell me where the boundry is
legally and how it would be determined?
Here in the U.S., it is sometimes helpful to look at what Congress says:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000101----000-.html
and what the Supreme Court says:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm
dp
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Mia Garlick, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Rob Myers, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Antoine, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Peter Brink, 03/03/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, James Grimmelmann, 03/03/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Peter Brink, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Dana Powers, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Dana Powers, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Terry Hancock, 03/04/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Terry Hancock, 03/01/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Terry Hancock, 03/04/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Greg London, 03/04/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question, Terry Hancock, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Greg London, 03/04/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Terry Hancock, 03/04/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
drew Roberts, 03/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Regarding SA and "strong copyleft" question,
Mia Garlick, 03/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.