cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?)
- From: "Dana Powers" <dana.powers AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?)
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:10:31 -0800
On 12/10/06, Greg London <email AT greglondon.com> wrote:
My understanding is that if Dave does not authorize
it, then to apply DRM that plays on his DRM-only
platform is to violate the anti-circumvention clause
of the DMCA.
Is this not the case?
DRM Dave should probably consult a lawyer. But a plain reading of
1201(b) suggests that this is not the case. Check out, for example,
Doubletwist. Take with a grain of salt though, as I am not aware of
any court rulings on this point yet, nor am I aware of any bar license
with my name on it :)
dp
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Greg London, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Mark Brown, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Rob Myers, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/06/2006
-
[cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Evan Prodromou, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Dana Powers, 12/11/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Greg London, 12/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Benj. Mako Hill, 12/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
-
[cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Evan Prodromou, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Benj. Mako Hill, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Greg London, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/07/2006
- [cc-licenses] Practical politics of DRM, was Re: Some basic agreements?, Terry Hancock, 12/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.