cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?)
- From: Francesco Poli <frx AT firenze.linux.it>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?)
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:26:47 +0100
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:07:17 -0500 Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
[...]
> I know Mia wants to get new license drafts out the door soon and this
> continuing discussion is not helping with that. Since there's no
> disagreement on what to do, let's help her do that.
I personally disagree that the current license drafts are OK as they
are, hence I'm not happy to hear that the plan is to release them as
final texts.
I won't repeat my concerns and doubts here, since I already expressed
them[1][2].
[1] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-November/004472.html
[2] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-November/004596.html
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpfPOwOSzHBE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Mark Brown, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Rob Myers, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/06/2006
-
[cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Evan Prodromou, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Dana Powers, 12/11/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Greg London, 12/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Benj. Mako Hill, 12/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?), Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
-
[cc-licenses] Enough please (was Re: Some basic agreements?),
Evan Prodromou, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Benj. Mako Hill, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, Greg London, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?, drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Francesco Poli, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Some basic agreements?,
Greg London, 12/07/2006
- [cc-licenses] Practical politics of DRM, was Re: Some basic agreements?, Terry Hancock, 12/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.