Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Case study: Magnatune

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Case study: Magnatune
  • Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:47:15 -0500

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 06:01 am, rob AT robmyers.org wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Carrera <daniel.carrera AT zmsl.com>:
> > drew Roberts wrote:
> >> As far as I understand things, it would probably be the same work re the
> >> (C) but a different work re the (P)
> >
> > Your reasoning is obscure to me because I don't know what you mean by
> > (C) and (P) are. This is why it's important to agree on a standard
> > vocabulary and make sure your audience understands it. It's just like
> > open standards.
>
> (C) is the copyright on the score or song.
>
> (P) is the copyright on the sound recording.
>
> If you look at your CD you'll see the (c) and (p) dates on it. They can be
> different, the (p) may be later than the (c).
>
> These are standard, if specialist, terms.

Great, someone else is aware of the terms. It should be noted that the two
copyrights (C) and (P) can be, and often are, held by different legal
entities.
>
> - Rob.

all the best,

drew
--
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page