Development of Creative Commons licenses

[wiki_tomos <wiki_tomos AT inter7.jp>]

I basically agree j lipszyc's answer to Daniel. 

What Wikipedia says is this, as I understand:
- if your work is under GFDL with Invariant Sections, then we do not 
accept your material. Not every GFDL'd work is accepted, after all. 
- Our materials remain free of Invariant Sections as long as they are 
hosted on our system. 
- You use of Wikipedia work in other contexts should follow GFDL. We 
did not put any Invariant Sections, but you can, to the extent GFDL 
allows it. 



Tomos

----- Original Message -----
From: j lipszyc <jl AT creativecommons.pl>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts 
<cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:16:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Re: Discussion Draft - Proposed License 
Amendment to Avoid Content Ghettos in the Commons


>Daniel Carrera wrote:
>
>> One convenient interpretation is that they are are effectively making a 
>> new license, by taking GFDL and adding additional restrictions. 
>
>Removing restrictions.
>
> > * You can't mix Wikipedia with standard GFDL work anyways.
>
>I think it doesn't make Wikipedia incomaptible with works published 
>under standard GFDL - it make it incomaptible with works which actively 
>use invariant sections. This is a lot different.
>
>Jaroslaw Lipszyc
>_______________________________________________
>cc-licenses mailing list
>cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>
>