baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: sindi keesan <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 01:20:15 +0000 (UTC)
See http://keesan.freeshell.org/bl for
2.2.16 kernel bzImage.vam which supports
vesafb (vesa 2.0 cards)
atyfb (ati mach64)
matroxfb (as module only). - download my matroxfb.o
Instructions in /bl/blfiles.htm
You can also use David's compiled xfbdev and fbset with this (at my site).
Framebuffer will display text on the console using various resolutions and color depths specified on the loadlin or lilo line (for vesafb and atyfb) or on the insmod line (for matroxfb).
This kernel also supports scsi boot (from hard drive or other scsi disk device, aic7xxx module for Adaptec PCI scsi controller), and sound (soundblaster and some others).
David Moberg helped a lot with this and offered to compile the same thing for 2.4.31 with usb-storage and the rest of his 2.4.31 usb support. In 2.4 atyfb will be a module, but vesafb has to be built into the kernel.
David, will the usb devices all be modules?
This kernel might support booting from memory stick (scsi and usb required) - should usb-storage be compiled into the kernel to avoid the need for initrd?
Take a look at config.vam (vesa-ati-matrox) and let him know if you want anything added. This config is loosely modelled on BL2 but also has loop built in. No network file systems or firewall, but they can be added on request. It is over 500K and therefore bz not z.
How much larger would the same kernel be in 2.4, without the USB?
keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
-
Re: [BL] new release of BL?
, (continued)
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, 3aoo-cvfd, 12/13/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/13/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, David Moberg, 12/13/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, David Moberg, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, David Moberg, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules, sindi keesan, 12/15/2005
- Re: [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules, sindi keesan, 12/15/2005
- Re: [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules, David Moberg, 12/16/2005
- Re: [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules, sindi keesan, 12/16/2005
- Re: [BL] Compiling framebuffer modules, sindi keesan, 12/20/2005
-
Re: [BL] new release of BL?,
3aoo-cvfd, 12/14/2005
-
[BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?",
Stephen Clement, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", Stephen Clement, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", David Moberg, 12/14/2005
-
[BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?",
Stephen Clement, 12/14/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.