Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

baslinux - Re: [BL] playmidi and aumix

baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Baslinux mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "David Moberg" <davidjmoberg AT lycos.com>
  • To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [BL] playmidi and aumix
  • Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 15:56:01 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: "sindi keesan" <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>

> I found a howto on AWE32 in linux, which says that if you boot
> linux with loadlin from DOS you don't need isapnp initialization,
> if you initialize in DOS. I have lines in autoexec.bat about awe,
> generated by the SB16 'diagnose' program. I also have a message on
> one of the three AWE computers 'awe initialization failed' so it
> must be working on the other two. (The one that failed is the
> awe64).
>
> What does initialization do?

It tells the PnP card what IO address and IRQ to live at. It's
like setting the jumpers on a non-PnP card.

> Forgetting initialization, what I need to do is insmod all the
> modules, but add to the insmod sb line: mpu_io=0x300 (for some
> reason 330 is busy on my newer computers, or maybe won't work for
> these cards).
> There was no mention of mpu_irq here, which was needed by the opti 931 card.

Does it demand mpu_io? MPU is for sending MIDI commands to a synthesizer.
My plain Vibra16 doesn't need it. cat /proc/ioports to see what's using
what.

> I presume I need v_midi too.

I don't think so. I haven't checked modules.dep from Slackware yet, but
I believe v_midi is for something else.

> Then /usr/local/bin/sfxload /usr/local/lib/synthgm.sbk
> (using the files from the awe32 tools package, I presume).
>
> They set the volume with a 'volume 30' (maybe that comes with the
> awe packages?) but I could try aumix or leave it at the default if
> that works.

The OSS mixer might not allow you to change these settings. This is
one of the advantages ALSA has over OSS: the mixer isn't as limited.

> I will try this tomorrow after we put back together one or more of
> these computers with awe cards. The drives and cards are playing
> musical slots this week as we discover dead or failing drives. You
> can apparently kill a 250MB drive by plugging the signal cable in
> backwards.

Tell me about it. I've lost several drives this way.
IDE cables are supposed to be keyed so that they insert only one way.

> The drive that had Ontrack Overlay on it and failed and
> had Ontrack removed and was working again just failed again (it is
> recognized during boot but programs cannot access it).
>
> Our largest free replacement drive (4G) had EZ-DRIVE (which means
> it was not possible to partition it with fdisk or PQMagic), which I
> removed with a PowerMax low-level format. I can't format it
> because e2fsck can't find the superblock or it is bad.

Why do you need e2fsck to format the hard drive?

> PowerMax
> tells me the drive is failing but we might use it for a while until
> it dies. The 8G drive is also failing, which you can tell by very
> slow measured speeds. The 4G took about 10 minutes for the
> 90-second test, but perhaps 90-sec is for 200MB drives.
>
> Is there some way to find the number for a secondary superblock so
> I can point e2fsck at it? I tried 8193 as suggested and double
> than and quadruple (it went out of range). I can now partition
> with fdisk (which used to complain about a bad flag), but cannot
> format. The drive has over 8000 cylinders, 16, 63 (sectors and
> tracks) so DOS sees it as 1GB but we only want it for linux. Does a
> low-level format remove all copies of the superblock? If so, where
> do I get replacements? You would think Maxtor's low-level format
> would produce a usable drive.

mke2fs is supposed to create the superblock (which is an ext2
thing) Why in the world does mke2fs demand an e2fsck?

> The 600MHz computer that had an onboard parport whcih produced
> garbage in DOS and nothing in linux is working fine now that I
> changed from 3f8 to 3bc. ???? IRQ5 is STILL taken by something,
> no idea what. I put in a parport card set to IRQ 5 and it printed
> even though a sound card won't work as IRQ 5. ??? It also
> printed if set to IRQ7. The onboard parport was disabled. I can't
> boot if I set an ISA card to the same address as an onboard port,
> but they don't seem to mind sharing IRQs. Why are sound cards
> fussier?

Sound cards are complicated beasts. They're designed so that nothing
can pre-empt them if data is sent to them. If they didn't do this,
sound quality would suffer badly.

David

--
_______________________________________________
NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at
once.
http://datingsearch.lycos.com





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page