baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: "David Lane" <Jaypooh3 AT hotmail.com>
- To: <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 10:41:42 -0400
>It's interesting you mention that. When I boot BL3 directly
>(without using DOS/loadlin.exe), Xvesa seems to be faster and
>more responsive. I am beginning to think that booting from
>DOS (any DOS) is not good for Xvesa. I will probably be
>recommending that people do a HD install and boot with LILO.
Speaking as one VERY raw newbie,BL seems to do most anything better without
DOS,and I like DOS.Because I have no need for DOS on the same machine,maybe
I'm a little biased,but I'm not installing anything but Linux on the next
machine either.I've went about as far with the 386 as it will go and will do
a Pentium II next.I'll never be able to learn compiling if I don't.This is
quite a learning experience,and more than just a little fun.
David Lane
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2
, (continued)
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
3aoo-cvfd, 05/01/2004
- Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2, Sindi Keesan, 05/01/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
James Miller, 05/01/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
3aoo-cvfd, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
James Miller, 05/02/2004
- Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2, Sindi Keesan, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
James Miller, 05/02/2004
- [BL] Hardrive utility, David Lane, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
James Miller, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
David Lane, 05/02/2004
- Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2, James Miller, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
David Lane, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
3aoo-cvfd, 05/02/2004
- Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2, David Lane, 05/02/2004
-
Re: [BL] BL3.2x and Xfree 3.3.2,
3aoo-cvfd, 05/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.