baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: 3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org
- To: BasicLinux List <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:10:07 +1300
Nomdo Jansonius wrote:
>
> >What software are you using to download it?
>
> Arachne 1.70 rev 3
That's a little unusual. But I would be surprised if
that were the cause (unless there is a weird interaction
with one of your other unusual features).
> >What is the exact command you use to mount it?
>
> By editing /etc/fstab, the drive is permanently mounted
> in /dos.
>
> /dev/hda6 /dos msdos defaults 1 0
I suggest you temporarily put a # at the beginning of that
line (and mount that drive manually) until we sort out this
problem.
> I have two HD's: HD1 has a primary DOS partition (c:),
Normally that would be /dev/hda1; however, I believe that
DrDOS actually puts C: at /dev/hda4
> an extended DOS partition with three drives (e: f: g:),
Apparently branching from /dev/hda2
> a linux native (hda3), and a linux swap (hda4). My DOS drive
> "temp" that is used to communicate with BL is hda6 (f:).
So, E: = hda5 F: = hda6 G: = hda7
> HD2 has one DOS partition (d:), a linux native (hdb1),
> and a linux swap (hdb2). BL1 is on hda3/4, BL2 is on hdb1/2.
So, putting it all together:
---------------------------------
/dev/hda1 C: ???
/dev/hda2 extended?
/dev/hda3 BL1 root
/dev/hda4 swap
/dev/hda5 E:
/dev/hda6 /dos F:
/dev/hda7 G:
/dev/hdb1 BL2 root
/dev/hdb2 swap
/dev/hdb3? D:
---------------------------------
First comment: you don't need both swap partitions. I suggest
you use /dev/hdb2 for both (and free up /dev/hda4).
Second comment: I am very worried about your first HD (hda).
There are two potential problems (which could be very serious
in combination). First, your use of extended partitions is
a risk. On a pure Linux system, extended partitions seem to
work fine; however, on a hybrid Linux/DOS system, it is safer
to use only primary partitions (four per HD). The second issue
is DrDOS.
A year or two ago, I tried using DrDOS with BasicLinux. I was
experimenting with creating the smallest possible DOS partition
for booting Linux, so I used DrDOS 5. I was astonished to find
that, when I partitioned/formatted the drive with DrDOS, it put
the C: partition at /dev/hda4. I had some problems with this
when I installed Linux on that drive, so I switched to DrDOS 6
(which is larger than DrDOS 5, but still smaller than MSDOS 5).
Unfortunately, DrDOS 6 also puts C: at /dev/hda4. And so does
DrDOS 7.
To summarize: For a rock-solid system where partitions can be
confidently shared between BasicLinux and DOS, use only primary
partitions (four per HD) and do not use DrDOS.
I know there are several DrDOS users running BasicLinux and most
of them probably don't experience serious problems. Perhaps just
the occasional glitch. However, I am used to a rock-solid system
and those little glitches give me the creeps.
In your case, the glitches are serious (particularly the one that
deleted your COMMAND.COM). If you did in fact partition hda with
DrDOS and it did put C: on /dev/hda4, then you do have a problem.
This is probably made worse by the extended partitions.
> Probably already during boot: in BL I only did three steps:
>
> 1) login as root
> 2) cd /dos
> 3) dir
>
> Then the file has already been reduced to 0 bytes.
I suspect that the problem occurs when the DOS partition is
mounted (which you are doing automatically in fstab). I suggest
you put a # at the beginning of that line so mounting is not
automatic. By doing the mount manually, you can determine
whether it is the cause; moreover, the manual mount might give
you an error message which you do not see when fstab mounts it.
It may also be possible in a manual mount to use a parameter
that eliminates your problem.
> the problem seems very persistent with abiword, but has
> definitely happened before with other .tgz files.
> Finally, I tried gzip abiword.tgz -d in DOS yielding a
> 15 Mb abiword.tar which was also reduced to 0 bytes by BL!.
It appears that something is fundamentally wrong here: some
inconsistency between how DrDOS sees that partition and how
Linux sees it. Files are getting lost in the confusion.
Cheers,
Steven
-
[BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Nomdo Jansonius, 01/02/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, 3aoo-cvfd, 01/02/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Nomdo Jansonius, 01/03/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, Day Brown, 01/03/2004
-
[BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
3aoo-cvfd, 01/03/2004
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Ron Clarke, 01/04/2004
-
[BL] fdisk for dummies,
Sindi Keesan, 01/04/2004
- Re: [BL] fdisk for dummies, 3aoo-cvfd, 01/05/2004
-
[BL] fdisk for dummies,
Sindi Keesan, 01/04/2004
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Ron Clarke, 01/04/2004
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
3aoo-cvfd, 01/04/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, Sindi Keesan, 01/04/2004
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Ron Clarke, 01/04/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, Sindi Keesan, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?,
Ken Martwick, 01/04/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, James Miller, 01/04/2004
- Re: [BL] basiclinux doesn't like abiword?, Ken Martwick, 01/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.