Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Words adopted into Biblical Hebrew Vocabulary

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: George Athas <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
  • To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Words adopted into Biblical Hebrew Vocabulary
  • Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:30:24 +0000

Yes, Karl, we can't pin the date of an entire work on one word. Logically,
that's correct. However, there is more than that as a factor at work here.
The rationale for the date that a loanword entered a language has to form
part of the argument as well. In other words, it's not just the word itself,
but also the historical, linguistic, and poetic concerns.

With פרדס, it's in all likelihood a word that entered the Hebrew vocabulary
in the Persian Era (or at a stretch just slightly earlier). It usually
appears in poetic contexts. It's unlikely that a scribe would update a poetic
text with new vocabulary, since poetry generally uses fancy vocabulary
anyway. It's more likely that a scribe would update a narrative or legal text
with a new word.

Given that, Qohelet and Song of Songs (even more so), which both use פרדס,
are most likely late compositions. Otherwise, you're proposing a scribe
updated an early poetic text (for which there is no specific manuscript
evidence), that already had a given word (which we don't know about) meaning
'paradise' or 'luxury estate' or whatnot, with a new word from another
language meaning the same thing. Most unusual and, therefore, less likely.
Possible? Yes, of course. Probable? Not really.

Furthermore, when you get clusters of loanwords, as you do in Song of Songs,
you start to narrow the field considerably. So, the argument that you can't
base the dating of a work on a single word might be theoretically fine.
However, in this case, I think the argument is a little blinkered to the
nature of the loanword, the nature of the composition, and the other
linguistic factors surrounding. Ergo, it is far more likely that Hebrew works
containing the word פרדס are later rather than earlier.


GEORGE ATHAS
Moore Theological College (Sydney, Australia)
www.moore.edu.au





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page