Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com>]

Ah... I see how that is a conjunction. lol

So I have to ask what is the difference between "that" as a conjunction, 
"that" as a relative participle, and "that" as a particle preposition?

B"H
John Steven


Brak wrote:
> Yes, I am talking about BW which is based on the WTS's e-text.
>
> How is the word "that" a conjunction?
>
> Every place in BW/WTS has it as Pr, except this one place.
> What makes it really weird is that the variation is only found in 1/2 of 
> a k/q.
>
>
> B"H
> John Steven
>
>
> Pere Porta wrote:
>   
> > John,
> > I assume you're speaking of BW, aren't you?
> > Well, I think both are mistaken. Neither Pr (particle relative) nor Pp 
> > (particle preposition).
> > I think the right answer is Pc = Particle conjunction.
> > Why? Because it comes after the verb "know": to know /that/... As 
> > "that" is here a conjunction -and not a relative pronoun nor a 
> > preposition-  the same in Hebrew: CONJUNCTION. Thus Pc and not Pr nor Pp.
> >  
> > Do you agree?
> >  
> > Yours,
> >  
> > Pere Porta
> > (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain) 
> >
> >
> >  
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com 
> > <mailto:Brak AT neo.rr.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     jb19:29,12 <$A/D.W.N>
> >     The kevtib has the <$A> as Pr, but the qere as Pp. Why?
> >     This is the only place that has this prefix listed as Pp, all the rest
> >     has Pr.
> >
> >     B"H
> >     John Steven
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     b-hebrew mailing list
> >     b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> >     http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pere Porta
> > "Ei nekrói ouk eguéirontai, fágomen kai píomen áurion gar 
> > apothnéskomen" (1Cor 15:32)
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>