Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com>]

Yes, I am talking about BW which is based on the WTS's e-text.

How is the word "that" a conjunction?

Every place in BW/WTS has it as Pr, except this one place.
What makes it really weird is that the variation is only found in 1/2 of 
a k/q.


B"H
John Steven


Pere Porta wrote:
> John,
> I assume you're speaking of BW, aren't you?
> Well, I think both are mistaken. Neither Pr (particle relative) nor Pp 
> (particle preposition).
> I think the right answer is Pc = Particle conjunction.
> Why? Because it comes after the verb "know": to know /that/... As 
> "that" is here a conjunction -and not a relative pronoun nor a 
> preposition-  the same in Hebrew: CONJUNCTION. Thus Pc and not Pr nor Pp.
>  
> Do you agree?
>  
> Yours,
>  
> Pere Porta
> (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain) 
>
>
>  
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com 
> <mailto:Brak AT neo.rr.com>> wrote:
>
>     jb19:29,12 <$A/D.W.N>
>     The kevtib has the <$A> as Pr, but the qere as Pp. Why?
>     This is the only place that has this prefix listed as Pp, all the rest
>     has Pr.
>
>     B"H
>     John Steven
>     _______________________________________________
>     b-hebrew mailing list
>     b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
>     http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pere Porta
> "Ei nekrói ouk eguéirontai, fágomen kai píomen áurion gar 
> apothnéskomen" (1Cor 15:32)