Biblical Hebrew Forum

[K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>]

Oun:

It’s good that you caught yourself now, than tie yourself up in knots trying
to defend the indefensible. And the reason they push so hard to deny the
long lives of many of the ancients is because modern man doesn’t want to
admit that people lived longer long ago.

The text is clear.

Karl W. Randolph.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Oun Kwon <kwonbbl AT gmail.com> wrote:

> I found an error in that on-line base-converter. It did not return correct
> answers for 137, 138, 139 7-base.
>
> Oun.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Oun Kwon <kwonbbl AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI,
> >
> > In his out of print 'Bible Dates itself' (1974,
> > www.amazon.com/Bible-Dates-Itself<
> http://www.amazon.com/Bible-Dates-Itself-Arthur-Earle/dp/0960078819/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1247771759&sr=1-1>)
> Arthur Earle argued for base 7 numeral system to account for the ages in
> > Patriarchal period (not Noah and antediluvian). A 100 year old in base 7
> is
> > 49 year old in base 10; 13 year old is 10 year old in base 10. (
> > www/base-converter <http://www.easysurf.cc/cnver17.htm#b10toba>)
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>