b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: <pporta AT oham.net>
- To: "K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>, "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:45:03 +0200
Karl,
I assume you mean to say 2Sa 22:30 (and not 28:30)
If so, then )RWC is a Qal form. The same as:
1. )QWM -- I will stand up -- Is 30:10
2. )$WB - I will return -- Jb 1:21
3. )MWT - I will die -- Gn 26:9
No Niph'al.
Pere Porta
----- Original Message ----- From: "K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR
Pere:
When you think of all the happax legomai nouns and verbs found in Tanakh,
then you wonder if a particular binyan can occur once for a verb used more
often in other binyanim?
A more important question, is RWC ever used as a transitive verb, in which
case a niphal use would not be out of order? 2 Samuel 28:30 "For in such I
run the squad…" looks like such an example.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:49 PM, <pporta AT oham.net> wrote:
>> Then, Karl, in your view this NRC (of RWC) would be Niph'al Past, >> third_______________________________________________
>> person singular masculine, with conversive waw attached to it?
>>
>> Pere Porta
>
> Yes.
> Karl W. Randolph.
____
Are you sure that the Niph'al of RWC exists? I realize that neither in the
bible nor in modern Hebrew appears even one form of Niph'al.
Conjugations Qal, Hiph'il, Pol'el, Hitpol'el are found ... but no Niph'al.
Greetings.
Pere Porta
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] pi'el form?
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] pi'el form?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 03/26/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
pporta, 03/26/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
K Randolph, 03/26/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
pporta, 03/27/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] BWR, Yigal Levin, 03/27/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] BWR, pporta, 03/27/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, K Randolph, 03/28/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, pporta, 03/28/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, pporta, 03/29/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, K Randolph, 03/29/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, pporta, 03/30/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, K Randolph, 03/31/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR, pporta, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
pporta, 03/27/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
K Randolph, 03/26/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 12:6: BWR,
pporta, 03/26/2008
-
Re: [b-hebrew] pi'el form?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 03/26/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Niph'al of intransitives, pporta, 03/29/2008
- Re: [b-hebrew] Niph'al of intransitives, Ken Penner, 03/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.