Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work.

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work.
  • Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:07:30 +0200

One of the basic premises of any science, including the study of history and of linguistics, is that the laws of nature, and the rules that govern human behavior, were always what as the are now. This allows scientists to use carbon 14, for example, to date organic material - since the C14's rate of decomposition has been the same for thousands of years. Since there is NO physical evidence that would show that people's lifespans were ever significantly different than they are now, taking the long lives in Genesis (or in any other ancient text) literally is a matter of faith, not science. Insisting that "everyone" lived longer back then is a leap of faith, not even mentioned in the text. Insisting that "it would not be wise to contradict Moses" is a statement of faith - science is built upon contradicting and challenging old assumptions. This list is NOT a forum for the discussion of faith. Unless anyone has anything really new to contribute to the matter, I suggest that we end this thread.


Yigal Levin


----- Original Message ----- From: "Shoshanna Walker" <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:12 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work.


Not ALL OF US don't believe that the ages in Bereishit are correct.

Also I don't think it is accurate that the Torah mentioned these ages
of only a select few individuals who lived hundreds of years (I think
someone on this list mentioned this).

The first men, the Nefilim, were giants and had lifespans of nearly
1000 years, but they were physically too strong, at the expense of
their spiritual selves. The remedy was to reduce their lifespans and
physical strength.

So in Bereishit 6:3, G-d tells us of His plan to reduce the human
lifespan to 120 years.

And He did it gradually. Noach's son, Shem, lived 350 years less
than Noach, and his son, Arphaxad, lived less than he. By the time
of Avraham, the tenth generation after Noach, the lifespan had
dropped to 175 years with Yaakov living 147 years. After that it
dropped to 70 years, with exceptions that approach 120 years.

So Sarah at 90 years was old - even too old to bear children, and the
reason for her beauty at that age, was that she became beautiful as a
result of G-d's angels communicating to her, just as the Midrash
tells us that Queen Esther, when she approached Achashverosh without
his summoning her, at great danger to herself, had angels accompany
her when she went in to see him, and cause her to be irresistably
beautiful to him, otherwise, he could have been angry enough to have
her killed.

Shoshanna




What are the presuppositions/assumptions being applied that would
justify taking
the ages = season? It appears that just because we do not believe that the ages
in Genesis are correct because "no one could live that long" does not
necessarily mean that that is so. The ages mentioned are in the text. There is
NO justification or evidence to prove that they are incorrect. Furthermore,
since Moses wrote it that way, and he was closer to the source(s) than any of
us, then it would be wise not to contradict him especially in comparison to the
Sumerian Kings List.

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page