b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard3 AT earthlink.net>
- To: "b-hebrew-lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:57:12 -0500
Yes, the term ‘Sri Lanka’ has its origin in Sanskrit and means venerable Lanka. The word Sri means venerable or respected. The term Lanka is the name of this Island. It was named Lanka in Mahabharata and Ramayana. Lanka means land.
ttp://www.blurtit.com/q648549.html
So Sri Lanka means "Venerable Land."
Apparently this same word "sri" is the only pronounceable word starting with "sr" in Webster's Dictionary (college edition). Very interesting. Thanks, Joel.
___________________________________________
Joel, I see what you're saying. In the
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary I have there are no
words beginning with "sr" except "sri." This word
is of Sanskrit background, literally means
"majesty, holiness," and is used "as a
conventional title of respect when addressing or
speaking of a distinguished Indian.
Maybe this word is related to the name of Sri Lanka.
Yours,
Harold Holmyard
______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?
, (continued)
-
[b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Uri Hurwitz, 09/04/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Dr Raoul Comninos, 09/04/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Dr Raoul Comninos, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Isaac Fried, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 09/07/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
joel, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Harold Holmyard, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Harold Holmyard, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Harold Holmyard, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Harold Holmyard, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Harold Holmyard, 09/07/2007
-
[b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Peter Bekins, 09/07/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Dr Raoul Comninos, 09/09/2007
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
biblical hebrew, 09/17/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Jason Hare, 09/19/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Isaac Fried, 09/19/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, biblical hebrew, 09/19/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Isaac Fried, 09/19/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, pporta, 09/20/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, biblical hebrew, 09/20/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Jason Hare, 09/20/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
biblical hebrew, 09/17/2007
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Dr Raoul Comninos, 09/09/2007
-
[b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Uri Hurwitz, 09/04/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.