Biblical Hebrew Forum

[davidfentonism AT aim.com]

 You construct excellent Hellenist-Roman interpretations, Harold. I'm afraid 
in that regard, you are far better versed than I am. truthfully, Shoshana's 
views are more more close to my own; even identical in most respects as I 
have seen so far except concerning the Spring festival advent of Mashiach 
Y'shua and His Fall Festival advent in the "Revelation" scroll.
 
 Best regards,
 David Fenton
    ----------------------------
 Gal. 27-29: For as many as have had a tevilah into Moshiach have clothed 
yourselves with Moshiach. There is not Yehudi nor Yevani (Greek), there is 
not eved (servant) nor ben chorin (freedman), there is not zachar (male) nor 
nekevah (female), for you are all echad in Moshiach Yehoshua/Yeshua. And, if 
you belong to Moshiach (YESHAYAH 53:10), then you are of the ZERAH of Avraham 
Avinu, you are yoreshim (heirs) according to the havtachah (promise).   
 -----Original Message-----
 From: hholmyard3 AT earthlink.net
 To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
 Sent: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 7:58 AM
 Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Dying, you will die Gen 2:17
 
  davidfentonism AT aim.com wrote:
> Harold,
>
> The only obstacles here are the misinterpretation of the Scriptures 
> which led to erroneous conclusions. You know Hashem changes not (Mal. 
> 3:6). He gave One Covenant which is eternal. The covenants with Noah, 
> Avraham, Moses do not alter Hashem's plan. Looking at it in a linear 
> (rather than cyclical) fashion creates this problem. The Avrahamic 
> covenant did not nullify the Noahide any more than Y'shua's nullified 
> the previous ones. It built upon them. The Renewed Covenant contains 
> all prior ones from Adam to David except it was an upgrade; made full 
> of meaning by Y'shua as the Pesach Lamb of Eloah rather than the blood 
> of goats and bulls. It was both a renewal and new (in the sense that 
> Y'shua was the superlative sacrifice). Y'shua supports and expands the 
> prior covenants, He did not cancel them.

HH: The fact that God does not change in his essential character (Mal 
3:6) does not mean that he does not act differently at different times, 
for the Bible shows that he does. You must prove claims such as there 
being "one covenant" from the Bible itself, which you have not done so 
far. There are actually quite a number of covenants, and to suggest that 
they cannot imply a change in God's procedures is a big claim. Frankly, 
Jer 31:31-33 itself shows that it is unsustainable because it posits a 
difference between the Mosaic covenant and the new covenant., which, as 
Gary, stressed, is not like the old covenant.

HH: Your claim to not be a Christian is odd in the face of your comments 
above. You are putting yourself forward as a disciple of Y'shua by your 
comments above, not to mention you quotation of Gal. 3:27-29 at the 
bottom of your posts. You may be giving a technical meaning to the word 
"Christian" that is not true to the NT, which uses it as an umbrella 
terms for  all the disciples of Y'shua. By the way, you need to add the 
chapter number 3 to your quote of Gal 3:27-29. Right now all you have 
are the verse numbers and the book abbreviation.

Yours,
Harold Holmyard

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
   
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading 
spam and email virus protection.