Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] We and us

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
  • To: David Kummerow <farmerjoeblo AT hotmail.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] We and us
  • Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:30:02 +0000

On 15/11/2006 05:30, David Kummerow wrote:
...

Perhaps a definition of "grammaticalisation" (American "grammaticalization") may help to clarify matters: "Grammaticalization is a process leading from lexemes to grammatical formatives. ... A sign is grammaticalized to the extent that it is devoid of concrete lexical meaning and takes part in obligatory rules" (Lehmann 1995: viii), the change being irreversible (Haspelmath 1999).

Thank you for offering a definition. The first part doesn't help, without more context. The second part does offer some criteria, but are they helpful? See below.

Looking again at the example: to what extent are the phrases 'adoni hammelek and `abdo grammaticalised? 'adoni hammelek will only be used in reference to a king, that is, the politeness expressed by the phrase has not extended past such a context. For it to be a polite pronoun, it would need to have lost much of the reference to "king" such that the phrase could be used more widely of any addressee when the expression of politeness is desired. Sure the phrases expresses politeness in the example; but the phrase isn't grammaticalised. ...

I suspect that the phrase which is a candidate for being a grammaticalised second person pronoun is not `adoni hammelek in full, but just 'adoni; this would be the logical counterpart of `abdeka. BDB does not list this as a polite form of "you", but does list it as "general recognition of superiority".

... Is this the situation too with `abdo? I'm not sure that the word has lost its lexical meaning of "servant" and instead is a polite pronoun. Note that the suffix is not obligatorily 3ms, but will change depending of the context (3mp, 2ms, 2pl, etc). ...

But the same change is found in Turkish "bendeniz", "your slave", which becomes "bendeleri", "their slave" in certain contexts, presumably when the person to whom politeness is directed is being referred to in the third person. So by this criterion this example of Helmbrecht's is not grammaticalised.

... This points to the non-grammaticalised nature of the expression, with `ebed still being a lexical word denoting "servant/slave". It is via the use of this lexical word denoting "servant/slave" that politeness is being expressed, not by the use of a grammaticalised polite pronoun. The issue is where `abdo is situated on the lexical-grammatical cline, with lexical words being used for the expression of politeness on one end of the spectrum, and grammatical items reserved solely for this purpose on the other.

It certainly is a cline, or perhaps a slippery slope; maybe an irreversible one, although given the decline in use of the polite form of "you" in many European languages might suggest otherwise, with the polite form reverting to exclusive use in its previous form e.g. second or third person plural.

--
Peter Kirk
E-mail: peter AT qaya.org
Blog: http://speakertruth.blogspot.com/
Website: http://www.qaya.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page