Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] consonant vowel order of )EHYEH & YAHWEH

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
  • To: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>, "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] consonant vowel order of )EHYEH & YAHWEH
  • Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 00:25:00 +0300

RE: [b-hebrew] consonant vowel order of )EHYEH & YAHWEH> Oh come on Vadim!
This example only shows the difference between an unaccented
*written* o in Russian.

The example shows that unaccented long a can be pronounced as short o.

> But any old fool can see that the accented written o and
the unaccented written o represent two completely different phonemes and so
this
example has no more relevance than my pointing out the difference between the
s in
bees and the s in lots.

Can't say for every old fool, but the example shows that composite schwa
based on 'a' sound could be pronounced as 'o.' Both kamatz-katan and doivor
corroborate.

Vadim Cherny



-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Vadim Cherny
Sent: Mon 10/3/2005 8:06 PM
To: Peter Kirk
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] consonant vowel order of )EHYEH & YAHWEH

>>Now, when you pronounce waw in YHWH as v, syllable-final guttural hey is
>>no problem (I don't suggest that pronunciation, just following your
>>example) if you distinctly syllabify the word, yh.vh or even yh.(bh)h.
>>When, however, you use soft w-u, such stop is almost lost, and hey
>>disappears.
>>Since, however, hey does not take schwa, hey was vocalized, and yeh.wa
>>became ye.ho.wa.
>
> When sheva under a guttural consonant becomes vocalised, the vocalisation
> is always a composite sheva and always matches the preceding vowel. So
> there is no way that an "o" vowel, or any kind of long vowel like the
> holam often postulated, could have found its way into the divine name by
> this kind of process.

The first vowel is more or less "a," thus composite schwa is with "a," too,
as you correctly noted.
Short a do become o - short o. Consider davAr - *dAvar - dOivor. In
Ashkenazic, first kamatz elongated to holam, while the second kamatz, now in
closed unaccented syllable, actually shortened to short o sound. The same
process created kamatz-katan out of kamatz. I wouldn't bet about the English
pronunciation, though the effect seems to be there, but Russian examples are
plenty: малина is more or less pronounced молина.

Vadim Cherny

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page