Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: [b-hebrew] Samaritan script/proto-hebrew

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
  • To: "�����" "����" <yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il>, Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org, tlt AT teol.ku.dk
  • Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Samaritan script/proto-hebrew
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:40:07 -0700 (PDT)

Consult the Mishnah. And about the kleinichkeiten, consult Tuv.
With all the myriad textual differences both in origimal langaue and
translations, no significant change in historical narrative emerged. Amazing.
One can not consider the new detail about Nahash the Ammonite of historical
weight.
As for the dating of the Heb. texts of the DSS in comparison with the
Samaritan: already the so called pre - Samaritan displays grammatical
harmonizations which are really "corrections" of earlier, unusal grammatical
forms that had a prior existence and which exist to this day in the MT.
Uri



éåðúï ñôøï <yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il> wrote:




Peter Kirk
wrote:
Uri wrote:

>the Mishnah, when quoting biblical texts, is practically using the MT
>
I would disagree with that. Take for example the Mishnaic chapter "Arba avot
neziqin" - The 4 main categories of damages - the goring ox, the cistern, the
"mav(eh" and fire.
The 3rd refers to Ex, 22: 4, and is based on a textual error - b(h for b(r.
The text the Tannaim had before them was closer to the Samarotan and Qumran.
The Amoraim no longer had that text and had the devil of a timew trying to
figure out what was mav(eh. The discussion ended in no decision.
Sincerely,
Jonathan D. Safren
Beit Berl College




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>From tladatsi AT charter.net Sat Apr 16 02:00:29 2005
Return-Path: <tladatsi AT charter.net>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mxsf38.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf38.cluster1.charter.net
[209.225.28.165])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B772A4C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 02:00:29 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from mxip07.cluster1.charter.net (mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net
[209.225.28.137])
by mxsf38.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
j3G60S2S014962
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 02:00:28 -0400
Received: from fep02.charter.net (HELO 209.225.8.224) (209.225.8.82)
by mxip07.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 16 Apr 2005 02:00:29 -0400
Message-Id: <3rr4tf$phhmcl AT mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net>
X-Ironport-AV: i="3.92,106,1112587200";
d="scan'208"; a="857266581:sNHT13268240"
X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.12 (webedge20-101-197-20030912)
From: <tladatsi AT charter.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 6:00:28 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [b-hebrew] Judges 4:11 & Joshua 15:57
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:00:29 -0000

Yigal,

PRD is most commonly used when people separate from each
other but there are instances when a location is involved.
In Gen 2:10 where the river flowing through Eden is
separated (yipared) or divided into four head(waters). In
Judges and Genesis the niphal is used. Gen 10:5 has lands
being divided (niperedu). But there are no cases of a
person being separated from a land. It always seems to be
like separated from like, land from land, person from
person.

Jack Tladatsi





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page