Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53:8 lamo

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org, Vadim Cherny <vadim_lv AT center-tv.net>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53:8 lamo
  • Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:05:12 -0800 (PST)



Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org> wrote:
On 20/12/2004 16:53, Uri Hurwitz wrote:

>
> ..."... In both languages the original meaning was probably
> "completeleness, fullness"; (again you'll find examples in both
> languages)."

To which Peter responded:
>
Again this proves my point: the etymological or "original" meaning is
not a good guide to current meaning.

UH: Not in the MT where you'll find many examples of the original
meaning of ShLM "completion" both in verbs, e.g. 1 Kings 7:51 -- watishlam
kol hamelakha , or nouns e.g. "shelamim" a type of sacrifice.

Uri

--








---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
>From sesamox AT hotmail.com Tue Dec 21 05:14:05 2004
Return-Path: <sesamox AT hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from hotmail.com (bay10-f45.bay10.hotmail.com [64.4.37.45])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3427F4C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:14:05 -0500
(EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:14:04 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY10-F4548C2D441CE2D469425ABB1A30 AT phx.gbl>
Received: from 217.172.69.102 by by10fd.bay10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:13:18 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [217.172.69.102]
X-Originating-Email: [sesamox AT hotmail.com]
X-Sender: sesamox AT hotmail.com
From: "Sesamo m." <sesamox AT hotmail.com>
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:13:18 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2004 10:14:04.0067 (UTC)
FILETIME=[CC5DB730:01C4E745]
Subject: [b-hebrew] Genesis 3:15 and order of ideas
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:14:05 -0000

Gen 3:15
"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and
her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."

I remember having heard when I was a child that though the chronological
order of events is inverted (first the serpent "bruises" the woman's seed
"heel" and then the Seed bruises the serpent head destroing it), in Hebrew
sometimes the most important event is mentioned first, and that's why the
order of events in this verse is inverted.
Was there any truth in that statement?

Thanks.
Sergio






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page