b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
- To: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>, b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il> wrote:
.....Phoenician certainly had Samekh.
Does anyone remember a case of Phoenician Sin (that is, of a Shin being used
for an /s/)?
Yigal
Not off hand,( can't locate my KAI at the moment).
It it is interesting that there are are cases where the persumed
proto-Semitic Sin becomes a Shin in BH -- compare Shams in Arabic to
Shemesh .
Also, one should keep in mind that the original Tha did not have a special
letter in Heb., and other NW Semitic dialects, and becomes a Shin in BH --
compare Thaur in Arabic to Shor.
Does anyone have a definite idea about the difference in original
pronounciation between the Samekh and the Sin?
Uri
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
>From peterkirk AT qaya.org Mon Nov 15 06:12:42 2004
Return-Path: <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk (mail.metronet.co.uk [213.162.97.75])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D304C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:12:37 -0500
(EST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [213.162.124.237])
by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP
id 74387418846; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:08:37 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <41988E48.8040008 AT qaya.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:08:56 +0000
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, az, ru, tr, he, el, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew and Welsh?
References: <20041112170006.2763F24B1BD AT metalab.unc.edu><1100452865.41979401
aa6c1 AT webmail.telus.net>
<41979DD2.8070900 AT qaya.org><BAY16-DAV12CBcKfExv000 312f7 AT hotmail.com>
<4197FBCB.6020206 AT qaya.org> <003201c4cab5$882b7fe0$11664684@xp>
In-Reply-To: <003201c4cab5$882b7fe0$11664684@xp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:12:42 -0000
On 15/11/2004 01:32, Yigal Levin wrote:
> ...
>
>
>Any claim of direct Hebrew-Welsh influence would have to account for the how
>and when of Hebrew-speakers arriving in Wales (or Welsh in Israel?), and I
>don't really think that there is any evidence of that. Of course, once
>Christianity had arrived, than "Hebrew" words in the (Latin) Bible may have
>made their way into Welsh, like "behemoth" etc. into English. "Bethesda", of
>course, is not Hebrew per se, it's the Latin spelling of the Greek
>pronunciation of the Aramaic name Beth-Hisda. In Hebrew it would have been
>"Beth-Hessed" or "Beth Hahessed".
>
>
>
I was of course making no such claim about Hebrew speakers in Wales or
vice versa - although it is known that the Phoenicians visited nearby
Cornwall. The Welsh language (of which I know very little) contains
Christian terminology borrowed from Latin and Greek during the
Romano-British period, e.g. eglwys "church" from Greek ekklesia, but I
don't actually know of any loans from Hebrew. Names for churches like
"Bethesda" and "Ebenezer" became popular in the 19th century I think.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Peter Kirk, 11/14/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Joseph I. Lauer, 11/14/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Peter Kirk, 11/14/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Hebrew and Welsh?,
Yigal Levin, 11/14/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Bethesda (was: Hebrew and Welsh?),
Ken Penner, 11/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Bethesda, Peter Kirk, 11/15/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew and Welsh?,
Jonathan Walther, 11/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew and Welsh?, Yigal Levin, 11/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Bethesda (was: Hebrew and Welsh?),
Ken Penner, 11/15/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Hebrew and Welsh?,
Yigal Levin, 11/14/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Yigal Levin, 11/14/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Kevin Riley, 11/14/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Uri Hurwitz, 11/14/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Peter Kirk, 11/15/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Peter Kirk, 11/14/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Joseph I. Lauer, 11/14/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Karl Randolph, 11/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Peter Kirk, 11/15/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Karl Randolph, 11/15/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Yigal Levin, 11/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Peter Kirk, 11/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Uri Hurwitz, 11/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Peter Kirk, 11/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Yigal Levin, 11/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Peter Kirk, 11/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/, Uri Hurwitz, 11/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: PS /g/,
Peter Kirk, 11/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.