b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il>
- To: "Yigal Levin" <Yigal-Levin AT utc.edu>, "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: The OT?
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:48:13 +0200
Don't forget that the Barathot are "apocryphal"
Mishnas not included in R. Judah Nasi's original edition but included later in
the Talmud. Which means that they too predate the editing of the
Mishna.
One possible reason for theirnot being included may
be that they present divergent opinions not accepted by R. Judah.
Case in point: the Baraitha I mentioned in Baba
Bathra 14b, which not only gibes a different order of the books of the Tanakh,
but also does not ascribe the composition of the entire Torah to Moses. (The
last 8 verses are ascribed to Joshua, for obvious reasons).
--------------
Jonathan D. Safren Dept. of Biblical Studies Beit Berl College Beit Berl Post Office 44905 Israel "sha'alu shelom yerushalayim yishlayu kol
'ohavayikh"
|
-
RE: The OT?
, (continued)
- RE: The OT?, Yigal Levin, 08/26/2002
-
Re: The OT?,
Polycarp66, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Yigal Levin, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Polycarp66, 08/26/2002
-
Re: The OT?,
Jonathan D. Safren, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Yigal Levin, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Dave Washburn, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, stoney, 08/26/2002
- RE: The OT?, Schmuel, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Yigal Levin, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Jonathan D. Safren, 08/26/2002
- Re: The OT?, Joe Sprinkle, 08/27/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.