b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: The OT?
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:06:26 -0600
>
> Personally, I use "OT" and "NT" since these are widely recognized as
> referring to the libraries in question, and they are also consistent
> with the designation "old things" and "new things" which classify these
> scriptures by age, not by value:
>
>
>
> How about Jewish Bible and Christian Bible? Isn't that the most correct?
>
No, because the Christian Bible includes both. If someone doesn't
like OT and NT, they can just decide in their own mind that the two
stand for "Our Text" and " 'Nother Text."
Now, could we please get on to something productive? For
example, I'm looking at the phrase 'erek 'apayim in Psalm 86:15,
and I can't help but wonder how "long of nose" came to mean "slow
to anger." Thoughts?
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"Don't let your mind wander.
It's too little to be left alone."
-
RE: The OT?
, (continued)
- RE: The OT?, Joe Sprinkle, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Nancy Johnson, 08/24/2002
- RE: The OT?, Peter Kirk, 08/24/2002
- RE: The OT?, Schmuel, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/24/2002
- RE: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, soren, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Dave Washburn, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/24/2002
- RE: The OT?, Dave Washburn, 08/24/2002
- RE: The OT?, Bill Ross, 08/24/2002
- Re: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/25/2002
- RE: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/25/2002
- RE: The OT?, Dave Washburn, 08/25/2002
- RE: The OT?, Shoshanna Walker, 08/25/2002
- Re: The OT?, Jonathan D. Safren, 08/25/2002
- Re: The OT?, Jonathan D. Safren, 08/25/2002
- The OT?, JwReform, 08/25/2002
-
RE: The OT?,
Bill Ross, 08/25/2002
- Re: The OT?, Jonathan D. Safren, 08/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.