b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky <hermeneutics AT kulikovskyonline.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 01:00:20 +0200
On 03:38 PM 16/08/2002 -0600, Dave Washburn wrote:
> Dave, I am simply repeating what I have heard about this from a
> colleague, who has a Ph.D. in linguistics. I am not trying to claim that
> WAYYIQTOL is always consecutive, simply that it often is, and that there
> is no reason to interpret it otherwise either in Gen 1:3 or in the
> opening verses of historical books which continue the historical
> narrative.
But that's precisely the point: "often is" doesn't account for all
usages. Syntax generally has some kind of unifying factor, some
common thread within a form's usage that explains all, or virtually
all, instances (idiomatic usages, such as Mark's historic present,
may provide exceptions but don't really negate the unifying-factor
principle). In the HB, it is not the *form* of the wayyiqtol that
denotes sequence, but the *context* in which it most commonly
appears. It also appears in other nonsequential contexts - relatively
often in fact, so such contexts do not appear to be aberrations or
idiomatic - which strongly suggests that its unifying factor is
something other than sequentiality. Again, the biggest problem with
recent studies of it is that sequentiality is assumed, then
nonsequential occurrences are manipulated to fit the sequence
mold. I submit that if we want to progress in our understanding of
the Hebrew verb system, it's time to throw away the mold and look
for a new one.
Dave, I believe the "unifying factor" is that the wayyiqtol form moves the narrative forward - it is essentially the glue that holds together the narrative. Now since narrative tells a story and stories are inherently sequential, this mean that most wayyiqtol forms are sequential. However, narrated stories often have "flashbacks" and "closeups", hence the pluperfect and epexegetical usages.
cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky
Check out my Biblical Hermeneutics web site:
http://hermeneutics.kulikovskyonline.net
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-
RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3
, (continued)
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Peter Kirk, 08/15/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Ian Hutchesson, 08/15/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Mike Sangrey, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Peter Kirk, 08/16/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Ian Hutchesson, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Dave Washburn, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Peter Kirk, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Dave Washburn, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/16/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/16/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Dave Washburn, 08/17/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Dave Washburn, 08/17/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Peter Kirk, 08/17/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/17/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/17/2002
- RE: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Dave Washburn, 08/17/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Mike Sangrey, 08/17/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Andrew & Debby Kulikovsky, 08/18/2002
- Re: My understanding of Gen 1:1-3, Yigal Levin, 08/19/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.