b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: hu=hi?
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:34:07 -0600
>
>
> Although I have no comment on the cause of this perpetual qeri'/kethib, I
> do think it
> should be obvious that it has no bearing on the validity of the documentary
> hypothesis.
> The consistency of the phenomenon in Torah and relative absence outside it
> seems
> more indicative of a global change in orthography than any difference or
> lack thereof in
> source.
> ---
It's easy to declare such a hypothesis "obvious," isn't it? Especially since
there is no
documentary or linguistic evidence to either affirm or refute it. That's the
beauty of
this field: one can toss out just about any idea and have a 50-50 chance of
being
right.
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
-
Re: hu=hi?
, (continued)
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, James Kirk, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Bearpecs, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Ian Hutchesson, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Bearpecs, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/31/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/31/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Lisbeth S. Fried, 07/31/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.