b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Trevor Peterson <06PETERSON AT cua.edu>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: hu=hi?
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:41:18 -0400
>===== Original Message From Polycarp66 AT aol.com =====
>There is no mistaking Is.
>30.33 and Job 31.11. 1 Kg 17.15 has both HW.) and HiY) which where has
>been felt necessary to repoint each in order to reverse the order!
Yes, there are places throughout the OT where the Masoretes have recognized a
mistake in the consonants; and it's understandable that some such mistakes
would creep in, considering the similarity between yod and vav. But I don't
think textual corruption is a reasonable explanation for what we find in the
Pentateuch. If anything, your examples from Job 31 and 1 Kgs 17 point to the
difference between what we find in the Pentateuch and these instances--both
passages show examples of hu written as hi, which is not part of the
perpetual
K/Q in the five books. It may not be worth mentioning, but I think the
Masoretes also saw a difference, in that they chose to provide the consonants
to read outside the Pentateuch.
Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics
-
hu=hi?,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 07/29/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, James Kirk, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Bearpecs, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Ian Hutchesson, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Bearpecs, 07/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.