b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: hu=hi?
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:28:37 EDT
In a message dated 7/29/2002 1:02:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dwashbur AT nyx.net writes:
> In a message dated 7/29/2002 12:47:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dwashbur AT nyx.net writes:
>
>
> >
> The phenomenon is correct; HW) does appear in many feminine
> contexts, which is why the Masoretes pointed it as HIW) to get it
> pronounced as HY). Like Trevor, I haven't seen a better
> explanation, and IMNSHO the DH has been dead for ages, it just
> doesn't have the good sense to realize it.
>
>
> In your dreams, Dave.
>
And considering that phenomenal screw-up of yours with the 1
Kings passage, I'm not sure you have any room to throw stones....
Yes, that was pretty bad, but I wasn't aware that I had thrown any stones. That's what I get for taking the lazy way out and rather than reading the Hebrew jumping to the English. There is no mistaking Is. 30.33 and Job 31.11. 1 Kg 17.15 has both HW.) and HiY) which where has been felt necessary to repoint each in order to reverse the order!
gfsomsel
-
hu=hi?,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 07/29/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, James Kirk, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Polycarp66, 07/29/2002
- RE: hu=hi?, Trevor Peterson, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Bearpecs, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/29/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Ian Hutchesson, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Charles David Isbell, 07/30/2002
- Re: hu=hi?, Dave Washburn, 07/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.