b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: John Ronning <ronning AT nis.za>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: JEDP
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:17:43 +0200
barre AT access1.com wrote:
>
> Can anyone offer some actual compositional analysis of say Genesis 1-11
> that they would
> offer as superior to the Documentary Hypothesis?
>
For structural analysis, Gary Rendsburg *The Redaction of
Genesis* is quite helpful. My dissertation (details in a
previous post) involved the issue tangentially, but shows
parts of Genesis 2-4 quite dependent on Genesis 1.
Whybray's book (I forget the title) also points out that
methodologically, almost any approach to dealing with the
evidence would be superior to JEDP.
I addressed the issue more directly (not on Gen 1-11,
however) in an article "The Naming of Isaac: The Role of the
Wife/Sister Episodes in the Redaction of Genesis"
(Westminster Theol. Journal, Spring 1991), 1-27. Shows that
where the JEDP "evidence" seems the strongest (apparent
contradictions), the scholars simply haven't understood
what's going on.
Regards,
John
-
JEDP,
barre, 12/14/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: JEDP, Lee R. Martin, 12/15/1999
- Re: JEDP, peter_kirk, 12/15/1999
- Re: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/15/1999
- FW: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/15/1999
- Re: FW: JEDP, Ray Clendenen, 12/15/1999
- RE: FW: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/15/1999
- Re: JEDP, John Ronning, 12/15/1999
- RE: JEDP, Armando Cottim (DSI), 12/16/1999
- Re[2]: JEDP, peter_kirk, 12/16/1999
- Re: Re[2]: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/16/1999
- SV: Re[2]: JEDP, Thomas L. Thompson, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/17/1999
- SV: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/17/1999
- Re[4]: JEDP, peter_kirk, 12/17/1999
- JEDP, Todd Young, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, irene riegner, 12/17/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.