b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Niels Peter Lemche <npl AT teol.ku.dk>
- To: "'b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: SV: JEDP
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:44:15 +0100
Rudolph did away with the Elohist already in 1938, and I never think that E
was accepted by the majority of the Uppsala School people. My own teacher,
Eduard Nielsen, certainly did not include E in his analysis as a continuous
source.
NPL
> ----------
> Fra: Jonathan D. Safren[SMTP:yonsaf AT beitberl.beitberl.ac.il]
> Svar til: Jonathan D. Safren
> Sendt: 17. december 1999 12:29
> Til: Biblical Hebrew
> Cc: Biblical Hebrew
> Emne: Re: JEDP
>
>
>
> Noel O'Riordan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Does it not strike you as strange that in many cases when the author
> uses
> > Elohim he writes with one style and point of view/agenda and that when
> he
> > uses Yahweh he uses another, this is leaving aside any theological
> imprint.
> > And this of course is the most obvious and simple argument for sources.
>
> May I point out that the stylistic differences between the assumed J and E
> sources are
> much less pronounced than those between P and, or P, D and these sources
> together.
> The stylistic differences between J and E are so few, in fact, that
> Driver, in his
> 1912 _Introduction to the Literature of the OT_ was hard put to find any,
> as compared
> with the many stylistic and linguistic characteristics of P and D which he
> listed; so
> few that, ever since Rolf Rendtorff's 1978 book on the Pentateuch it has
> become
> customary to speak of the "older sources" or "older strands" or just
> simply JE.
> As I have already pointed out, Rofe and Sturdy have argued against any JE
> source
> division in the Balaam Narrative, and Redford, in a similar vein, argues
> in his 1970
> _A Study of the Joseph Narrative_ that the Joseph story is one unified
> novellat to
> which there have been added a number of interpolations (it seems to me
> that I remember
> von Rad already on the way to ditching the Documentary Hypothesis
> regarding the Joseph
> Narrative, but I can't be sure)
> --
> Jonathan D. Safren
> Dept. of Biblical Studies
> Beit Berl College
> 44905 Beit Berl Post Office
> Israel
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: npl AT teol.ku.dk
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
-
Re: JEDP
, (continued)
- Re: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/15/1999
- FW: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/15/1999
- Re: FW: JEDP, Ray Clendenen, 12/15/1999
- RE: FW: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/15/1999
- Re: JEDP, John Ronning, 12/15/1999
- RE: JEDP, Armando Cottim (DSI), 12/16/1999
- Re[2]: JEDP, peter_kirk, 12/16/1999
- Re: Re[2]: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/16/1999
- SV: Re[2]: JEDP, Thomas L. Thompson, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/17/1999
- SV: JEDP, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/17/1999
- Re[4]: JEDP, peter_kirk, 12/17/1999
- JEDP, Todd Young, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, Noel O'Riordan, 12/17/1999
- Re: JEDP, irene riegner, 12/17/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.