b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re[2]: WP
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 01:18:45 -0500 (EST)
One for Dave to duck, or to try to answer:
If weqatal is nothing but qatal which happens to have a conjunction,
why are the instructions for building the tabernacle (for example)
full of weqatal's and yiqtol's but no qatal's; where the corresponding
account of the building is largely identical except that it has
wayyiqtol's and qatal's but no yiqtol's?
If we look at the clause level, I am not sure how to account for this
data apart from a "traditional" four component model with something
like a "waw conversive". Then there is a separate issue of deciding
how this strange system arose (but there are many very strange things
in real human languages!)
If we are to move anywhere beyond such a traditional view, I am sure
we need to look above the clause level. So my advice to Dave would be
to brush up his discourse studies before taking his studies further.
Peter Kirk
-
Re: WP
, (continued)
- Re: WP, Bryan Rocine, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
- Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/23/1999
-
Re: WP,
Lee R. Martin, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
- Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
- Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
- Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
- Re[2]: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Bryan Rocine, 01/23/1999
- Re: Re[2]: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
- Re[3]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
-
Re: WP,
Paul Zellmer, 01/23/1999
- Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.