Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: WP

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: WP
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:31:22 -0700


Lee,
> Dave,
> Yes, I understand what Rolf is saying. I agree with him and with you that
> there is no "separate" weqatal. I never said there was. But weqatals are
> *not* used like qatals without "we-". How do you explain that? That wasn't
> my point. The 2 components of the finite verb system are 1) prefix
> conjugation, 2) and suffix conjugation.

Um, now I'm confused. If there is no such thing, how can it be
used differently? Obviously I'm missing something here. As for the
2 components, am I correct in assuming that the WP is subsumed
under the prefix conjugation?

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
A Bible that's falling apart means a life that isn't.



  • Re: WP , (continued)
        • Re: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
        • Message not available
          • Message not available
            • Re: WP, Paul Zellmer, 01/23/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
      • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Bryan Rocine, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/22/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/23/1999
    • Re: WP, Lee R. Martin, 01/23/1999
      • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
    • Re: WP, Dave Washburn, 01/23/1999
    • Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
    • Re: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
    • Re: WP, Rolf Furuli, 01/23/1999
    • Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999
    • Re[2]: WP, Peter_Kirk, 01/23/1999

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page