xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference"
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 AT cam.ac.uk>
- To: cowtowncoder AT yahoo.com
- Cc: XOM interest <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference"
- Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:10:56 +0000
Thanks,
Tatu Saloranta wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/1/09, Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
I may have spoken too soon. libxml agrees with xerces:
~/tmp$ xmllint --loaddtd tests.xml<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/03/WD-SVG-20000303/DTD/svg-20000303-stylable.dtd">
<svg xmlns="%SVGNamespace;"/>
There's still a real bug here, but it's likely in the DTD design, not Xerces. Pretty obviously, the DTD does not say what its
I think this is correct, if snippet above is accurate: PEs are only resolved
in DTD subsets. In this case reference is within regular xml content, so it
is not recognized as PE. Perhaps intention was to use a General Entity
instead, which would work as expected.
To make it clear, my example was
<!DOCTYPE svg SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/03/WD-SVG-20000303/DTD/svg-20000303-stylable.dtd">
<svg/>
and no explicit mention of any namespace. The program I used (pstoedit) did not explicitly namespace any elements and this was the smallest example I could make that shows the bug (I had an XML declaration but assume that isn't the problem). I would assume - like Tatu - that the PE would not be replaced in Eliotte's example. I can't see how any namespaces could be applied to the svg element, so I am still mystified as to how the bug materializes.
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference"
, (continued)
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme inabsolute URI reference",
Michael Kay, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme inabsolute URI reference", Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Tatu Saloranta, 01/02/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/03/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Tatu Saloranta, 01/04/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Elliotte Harold, 01/04/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Peter Murray-Rust, 01/04/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Tatu Saloranta, 01/04/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/03/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.