sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Sourcemage Users List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:29:07 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:11, David Kowis wrote:
> I'm not so sure it'd be a good idea to put floppy and cdrom entries in
> /etc/fstab . I mean we'd have to go in and configure them anyway ( for the
> cdrom at least...)
> I suppose a skeleton commented out would be best suited. For example: what
> if someone has an all scsi system? Unless we can autodetect the cdrom drive
> it might just provide some unnecessary error messages.
> Besides, I'm feeling pretty confident that everyone using this distro is
> savy enough to add their own entries to /etc/fstab and /mnt/
>
> I am in favor of keeping the /mnt directory on the iso, because I use it
> during rescue. I supppose I could make it, but its kinda a defacto
> standard. Heck, it might even be a standard somewhere. :)
> Dave
Correct me if i am wrong but the cdrom entry would be available from the
installer ? It IS a cdrom after all ?
So it would just add itself to /etc/fstab ?
ANd of course it is expected we are savy enough to set it up for ourselves, I
would just like it automagically done. It isn't something that would inhibit
users choices, I personally would change it to mount to /cdrom and mkdir /
cdrom on my first boot. It would just be a little more user friendly to have
it in there already.
Hamish
- --
IRC nick: drmoriarty
SMGL co-conspirator
#Do You SMGL!?
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/e5uG8fSufZR6424RAtvoAJ9Y7oOiUXx9KLCXIhQlczWTOIAgcgCeL120
sBCoPyCvFillFbDFVaMsl0I=
=FVgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Geoffroy, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Eric Sandall, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Hamish Greig, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Eric Sandall, 10/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
David Kowis, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Hamish Greig, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
David Kowis, 10/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Hamish Greig, 10/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Hamish Greig, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
David Kowis, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Hamish Greig, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Eric Sandall, 10/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Jason Flatt, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Hamish Greig, 10/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Eric Sandall, 10/01/2003
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Geoffroy Giraux, 10/04/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, evraire, 10/01/2003
-
RE: Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
evraire, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 10/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Users] su command on ISO 0.7,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 10/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.